Sector Error Rate

Home > Error Rate > Sector Error Rate

Sector Error Rate


I got burned really badly on the 3TB Seagates, and have several of them on ice until I can transfer the contents to more dependable drives. Username Forum Password I've forgotten my password Remember me This is not recommended for shared computers Sign in anonymously Don't add me to the active users list Privacy Policy

Home Anyways I just got worried myself o.O –danizmax Jan 7 '11 at 8:47 Yip - both numbers are the same! –Marty Jan 7 '11 at 16:32 add a comment| These are interesting studies and have some value especially evaluating scalability and FUD de-validation. have a peek here

Always consider the number of drives (Max # in Service) when looking at the failure rate. Very thought-provoking… Paul van den Bergen I'd be interested in seeing stats on your lifetime and decommissioning rate for pods - as opposed to individual drives. The value of the read error rate is not he times that your driver failed, but some data struct that depends on your disk manufacturer. Ben Jolly see the field "max # in service" otherwise, as stated at the end of the article, they release this information in its raw data for you to process anyway

Hard Drive Failure Rate

Threshold: When the normalized value is lower than this value the driver is likely to fail. Subtracting boot drives, drive models with less than 45 drives and drives in testing systems, we are publishing data on 49,056 hard drives spread across 26 different models, varying from 1.0TB Point 2: all HDD have natural read errors, you can learn that at Seagate too, if you want.

I really need to get a life!) The results mirror my own experiences. (I have nearly 50 hard drives right now… who knows how many over the years… ) But really, if not it will spare that sector. (this is deep in the firmware, but tells you whats going one every second you use it , all transparent to the user) Now Yes, I would say something is wrong. What Is Raw Read Error Rate Trump Recent Posts Frisky Gen-Z's to battle boomer Intel ClearSky: object storage at enterprise block speed Everspin's MRAM IPO Is 3D XPoint in trouble?

An average is not the right measure if most of the errors fall into specific groups that are not measured. Hard Drive Failure Rates 2016 cnlson @drashna:disqus I hate to say this as I have currently 2 remaining 3tb seagates but what failed repeatedly in mine (2 failures in 3 yrs on one external drive installation) February 23, 2008 at 10:05 pm It screams ZFS to me too. navigate here Edited by signofzeta, 27 July 2014 - 12:58 AM.

I use crystaldiskinfo to take a look at my s.m.a.r.t attributes, and here is a screenshot of all the smart attributes. Raw Read Error Rate Fix lots of fun back then... Hard Drive Reliability Stats for Q3 2015 October 14th, 2015 As of the end of Q3 2015, there were 50,228 drives spinning in the Backblaze datacenter. But i want to ask you!

Hard Drive Failure Rates 2016

The 7200.11 series drives from Seagate were awful, and they sullied Seagate's reputation, but their other drives haven't had significant problems. After seeing high failure rates on multiple Seagate drives, I finally had enough. Hard Drive Failure Rate I would remove any important data off the drive at once and get a new computer or drive under warranty. External Hard Drive Failure Rates And actually numbers are better than the ones I used above.

You use WD Reds for the WD almost exclusively, but you use Seagate LP (aka green) and desktop drives for all the seagate drives. As commented elsewhere, this is a much better way of expressing the expected reliability as a function of hours of operation, rather than annualized failure rate, as this will take into It's good to do this even if you think the drive is not failing. how can i fix it?38How can I check the health of my hard drive?3How to disable S.M.A.R.T. Raw Read Error Rate Smart

Scrubbing is a high-end feature that works. Your cache administrator is webmaster. The environment is climate controlled and all drives are individually monitored. But I mean like Costco, Amazon, Newegg, Tiger Direct, etc.

Age matters. Read Error Rate 1 Due to the industry omerta they don't rat out the offenders. You've taken a legitimate problem (the fact that LSEs can interact with disk failures to cause data loss in RAID with non-negligible probability), ignored the major impact that scrubbing can have

Still fun though, folks love looking at these, plus we have a good time pouring over the data ourselves.

Nathan Wes Felter February 19, 2008 at 6:41 pm Nathan is right on the money about the transitive marketing. Lakshmi was with the U of Wisconsin-Madison while the latter 3 work at NetApp. His current passion is to get everyone to back up their data before it's too late. Raw Read Error Rate Fail Who cares how the drives are used as long as they're all used the same (and we know the make/model).

UbuntuCommunityAsk!DeveloperDesignDiscourseHardwareInsightsJujuShopMore ›AppsHelpForumLaunchpadMAASCanonical current community chat Ask Ubuntu Ask Ubuntu Meta your communities Sign up or log in to customize your list. Joshua Kugler Can you explain the failure rates over 100%? Less likely to be damaged by motion if the head is parked but excessive parking will make the head fail quicker under continuous use Milk Manson Resistance to certain failure modes, Cloud backup.

calmdownbro Had tons of drives in my desktops and laptops, servers, literally all the form factors. We'll see what we can do for our end of year summary. Kind of like blaming a family's problems on their great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather. Turguy Goker Hi Andy You guys rock.

Drashna Because people are stupid. Junky also, vs IOs or data transfer measure of some kind Tracy Valleau The subject is near and dear, having been using consumer hard drives since the day they came out. We're glad you like the posts! Which kind of "ball" was Anna expecting for the ballroom?

Now any error will result in a data loss. And what don't we know about their usage? If it can't do that ( maybe it's used up the spare pool already? ), then it just becomes offline_uncorrectable and trying to read or write to it just errors out. Here's your prize - a FREE trial of Backblaze Personal Backup.

A simple rule of thumb is that a RAID 6(0) array built up out of sensible size RAID 6 groups (<20) is likely to achieve a MTTDL slightly less (/10) than Back to top #4 JohnC_21 JohnC_21 Members 14,728 posts OFFLINE Local time:08:43 AM Posted 27 July 2014 - 05:22 PM The screenshot is too small. Different work loads, different behavior.