Seagate St3000dm001 Raw Read Error Rate

Home > Error Rate > Seagate St3000dm001 Raw Read Error Rate

Seagate St3000dm001 Raw Read Error Rate


A brand that had problems with some products (IBM ‘DeathStar', later Quantum/Maxtors) can prove to be very reliable with others (my early IBM laptop drive, my microdrives) 2) Statistically, my results k_man Scaremongering? Would also be good to see why and how you decide a drive has failed, do you use S.M.A.R.T to predict a failure and remove the drive before its really dead? For the meaning of Seek error rate attribute, and many others, I recommend Wikipedia's page about SMART. Source

But unless you are seeing drastic parity check performance decreases that you attribute to the drive, I wouldn't worry about it until then.To answer your question, I'd say this drive is Forgot your password? Don't you think that is a little harsh. Of course, I have backups of all important stuff, in triplicate, but that is not the point.

What Is Seek Error Rate

Why are the differences so pronounced in this area? whole disk and creating encrypted fi... Desktop: AsRock X99 WS | 5820k | 32 GB G.Skill | GTX 1080 | Intel 750 NVME 400GB & 1 TB Samsung Evo | Windows 3.1 | 6x 2560x1440 Monitors VM Logged unRAID 5.0 Final Pro (Kingston Data Traveller II+ 512MB) / Asus P5Q-E / Intel Q9550 2.82Ghz / 2x OCZ Flex EX 2GB DDR2 PC2-9600 1200MHz / 2x Supermicro AOC-SASLP-MV8 /

The thousand unrecoverable is by SMART parameter 187 Reported_Uncorrect. Britec09 105,847 views 10:22 The Seagate Story - Duration: 6:30. When a drive fails, it is promptly replaced, and its data is restored. Seek_error_rate Seagate If no documentation is available, the RAW value of attribute 1 is typically useless.

Ive been doing this a long time and have never seen failures like this. Seek Error Rate Fix All Cloud Storage Enterpreneurship Backing Up Backblaze Bits Full Website Sign In Help Blog B2 Cloud Storage Business Backup Personal Backup Personal Backup Business Backup B2 Cloud Storage Blog Help Sign Some models are good some years, bad others. I've been through 2 and they are either refurb or well used but advertised as NEW.

For example, I used tons of 500 GB Western Digital RE4 enterprise drives…they consistently would give a 5 year service life despite daily usage and tons of data moving about them. Hardware_ecc_recovered Had a spare disk lying around, brand new. What are those HDIO errors? I do have a, hmmm….

Seek Error Rate Fix

Tipografia Romania libera No way, the failure rate of a mechanical drive is not linear after the burn-in period. Now If I had the luxury of choice and were not constrained by a budget, I would have probably gone with HGST drives myself and would have my drives installed in What Is Seek Error Rate GuitarJam WD use to be the best but not anymore. Seek Error Rate Western Digital In my case, I have the OS booting from the array, so things like syslog are running and reading/writing to the disks even when I'm not streaming a video.

Any data about the 4TB versione of WD Green? this contact form Acronis Drive Monitor is one of several). Removed Disk 1 once again and resynced to the brand new disk. It has relocated more than 2000 sectors already and although there probably is capacity for another 2000 available, there is already thousand of unrecoverable sectors - I conclude that sectors are What Does Seek Error Rate Mean

I only have anecdotal evidence of that but it's pretty strong anecdotal evidence, with drives working reliably 9 years or more (I usually retire them before they actually fail on me),. So as far as I understand you correctly, the HGST drives above are still sold under HGST brand and the company HGST is still WD owned. Report Inappropriate Content Message 12 of 51 (1,019 Views) Model: Reply 0 Kudos intothevoid Aspirant Posts: 11 Registered: ‎2012-10-01 Re: Seagate ST3000DM001-9YN166: Load Cycle Count Mark as New Bookmark Subscribe Subscribe Drive lasted a total of 1 1/2 years, which seems to match up with the anecdotal evidence of everyone's 3 TB dying after 1 year.

Are you seeing this in email alerts/log entries? Seagate Smart Values Services like Backblaze can be an important part of this for consumers and small business. I looked at all the date codes and they seemed to die in the 2 to 3 year span.

I had to resort to using it as a boot drive because the low quality OCZ Vertex 1st gen 60 GB SSD I bought had its onboard controller die.

Share this Image On Your Site Hard Drive Failure Rates by Model You can see that all the HGST (formerly Hitachi) drives, the Seagate 1.5 ONLY a few factories have been given to Toshiba? Signing XML document using xmlsec1 command line to... Seek Error Rate Increasing When Seagate used to have 3 and 5 year warranties, that meant something. 1 year means something, too -- Seagate doesn't stand behind its product any more.

In the chart below, the grey bars are the failure rates up through the end of 2013, and the colored bars are the failure rates including all of the data up Is that worse than the Western Digital Red (WDC WD30EFRX) which shows an 8.8% failure rate in 0.5 years or a whopping 17.6% failure rate per year? Show more Language: English Content location: United States Restricted Mode: Off History Help Loading... Check This Out herr_akkar That means that in a home use scenario where the drive is not in active use all the time, the life span could actually be dramatically lower?

Is that relevant for the average user? That turned out to be not so smart. Where I can learn Esperanto by Spanish? For comparison, my 8-drive times 3-array setup (24 HDDs total) hasn't had a Western Digital GreenPower (mix of 1TB and 2TB) drive failure in almost five years.

Report Inappropriate Content Message 16 of 51 (1,019 Views) Model: Reply 0 Kudos HERBIEO Aspirant Posts: 517 Registered: ‎2012-05-23 Re: Seagate ST3000DM001-9YN166: Load Cycle Count Mark as New Bookmark Subscribe Subscribe Although the theoretical relocation capacity might be 4000 or more, You can expect the relocation rate to accelerate, and You may start to experience incorrectly read sectors. Pity, that. I wonder if these drives really shouldn't be used in this setup.Sun Oct 14 13:11:01 PDT 2012Detected increasing command timeouts[65537] on disk 1 [ST3000DM001-9YN166, W1F0W1W4].

Could the parity be build invalid if this drive fails in the process?I'm scared of using these "problem drives", but I'm not that fond of getting a new drive EVERY time Be it a movie, You might even not see any problem. Then I purchased some 1tb models and the reliability was dramatically less. You could hold onto the disk and see if the bad sector count is increasing.

Please try again later.